Does Mcafee s Siteadvisor Affect Your Business?

The purpose of McAfee SiteAdvisor is respectable by all means: The site aims to warn users about the malware, phishing and other scams if it is accompanied by surfing the Internet and downloading software or obtaining benefits from the Internet. In fact, the service was so popular that the site was the best in the category of Web-Defense by the Time Magazine in 2005.
SiteAdvisor uses automatic analysis tools to detect potentially harmful content, such as browser uses or downloads that spyware or viruses. As a " " dangerous environment, which only means that the analyzed Web site links to sites that as a threat, also affects the security ratings. In addition, user feedback is also assessing that the general concerns of the public Internet could have with the Web site, including things as wide as & 39; bad shopping experience ".
Considering great popularity and influence of SiteAdvisor, the service tend to be, in a way, A Better Business Bureau of the Internet, the safety and reliability reports on Web sites. SiteAdvisor definitely has the potential to the visitors away from the sites, which in the opinion SiteAdvisor, bad things do, and approve business websites, to its security checks.
Major difference between BBB and SiteAdvisor is that a Web Site not become a member of SiteAdvisor in order to qualify for its services. Instead, SiteAdvisor rates, or trying to evaluate all the Web sites to which it has access. As a result, McAfee has influence on the company, the Web sites evaluated. While a good rating in May add credibility to a site, a bad away potential customers of the company as unsafe.
While the intent of the McAfee service is great, its implementation is not perfect. There were reports in the past abused that McAfee SiteAdvisor & 39; ratings to meet competition artificially low by assigning security ratings on websites, competing anti-virus and anti-spyware products, as Lavasoft.de, manufacturer of AdAware, coffeecup.com or spamhuntress. Com. This is not the case with the Web sites at the moment, but it is still unclear why the red-sites were marked and McAfee was forced to remove the low ratings.
SiteAdvisor security is a very powerful tool that should not be abused . Unfortunately, at the moment of writing, the mechanisms provided by the Service for the safety assign negative votes and no transparency at best questionable. Sites can red flag for a link to a site that has, receives or later, a negative assessment of SiteAdvisor. Companies can marked for the " bad experiences shopping & 39; of only one or two Internet users who for whatever reason, do not like the site, its products or owners. In addition, sites can be as threats by unanimous " " experts, which can only say that, as quoted from the Web site SmartPCTools ", the solution is not strong enough ".
Would you trust, anonymous experts and imperfect technical measures to access your Entrepreneurial decisions? Well, it seems that now you have no choice whether you want it or not, your online business gets a boost or disapproval of a company employs, the experts and make money evaluations.
McAfee evaluation of your company. Does that affect you?
Having your business depend on an opinion of an independent third party is not a good message. Is there a McAfee SiteAdvisor rating affect your company? Check the evaluation of the safety now at www.siteadvisor.com. If your company has received a red flag for no apparent reason, to learn what others think McAfee and its business practices in www.smartpctools.com / Truth glady jenniffer



Bookmark it:

How to Quit your Day Job with Turnkey Websites

It is & 39; one of the hottest search terms on & 39; Internet for the moment: Turnkey sites.

What of & 39; is exactly? According to Wikipedia, the term is often used, key in hand, in the industry & 39; the technology, mostly for the description of pre-built & quot; packages & quot; computer, all for the implementation of a certain type, the task of the suppliers and sold in a bundle.

In d & 39; means that the key sites in the hands generally refers to a pre-established full load website for total cost, including the domain name, for the development, the images, the programming -- And sometimes dropshipper contact details for the delivery of the products, when they e-commerce site or ebooks to sell the site.

How you know what that life with the key sites in the hand? By preserving their low cost through d & 39, a Web-key in the hand and the manufacturer to sell over and over again on the websites such as ebay - They not only the customers of & 39 ; money with the final L & 39; auction, but you ensure that even those customers who your customer will pay about $ 9.95 per month, regardless of the time that & 39 they retain their website.

But you know nothing on the servers of companies and & 39; l & 39; accommodation? Then that - most of my accommodation & 39; dealers have even ever holder & 39; HTML editor before, but they are in thousands of US dollars per month after my plan d & amp , 39; use easier. Here is what you have to do & 39; lot of money through the sale of Internet sites from a single source:

1. A dealer d & 39; accommodation (http://www.designshrine.net/host/reseller.html)
2. A candidate for a key site in the hands Provider (http://www.designshrinephpfactory.com/)
3. A free HTML editor (we recommend NVU)
4. An FTP program (we recommend FlashFXP)
5. An account at ebay & 39 d

That & 39; s it! Here is the process:

1. You connect to your Web key in the hand d & 39; accession and download, for example, one of the & 39; real estate.

2. They buy a field to define, and the domain name servers & 39; accommodation for your account resellers (c & 39; ie ns1.yoursite.com and ns2.yoursite.)

3. Install the downloaded file on your site, key in hand d & 39; server hosting resellers.

4. You log on eBay with the description & 39; that they will win this fabulous building key in hand, and it is NECESSARY THAT THEY & 39; D & 39; HOME WITH THE WEB SITE for $ 9.95 per month (or what do you want to pay).

4. Auction ended, and told us that you $ 175 for the site only on the lower side. They come to $ 175 MORE TIME HOW THE WHITE AND EARNINGS R SIDUELS of $ 9.95 per month! We have dealers, the approximately $ 12000 per month and a half years, but one can reasonably expect approximately $ 2000 per month in the first 8 months or less.

5. You install an end next book shop area with a vitality and, once again, make another $ 9.95 per month.

6. Can the business ebook you will receive a further $ 9.95 per month.

TURNKEY site marketing is great, but this is real money & 39; the & 39; accommodation. You get the idea & 39;. They sell l & 39;.

The just demands of the majority of member-site key in the hand, c & 39; is that you must sell their sites with an area already installed on the server. You can never sell the script, as they do, or your account will be terminated.

This n & 39; is not a system of & 39; rapid enrichment or a slap in the face & 39; em up website, which you hope that you & l 39; money into existing Internet - that occurs NIE. Like every company, it can transpiraction - but not much. Normally, there are approximately 2 hours per day l & 39; installation of sites (typically takes about 5 to 10 minutes) and answer the questions of the potential buyers.

When quit your daily work, you have so many customers who you work 8 hours per day, as I do, but everything is worth - at home or office without the person to you, but is worth everything in the world! lannie miesha



Bookmark it:

Notebook or Desktop Computer, What s the Best Buy ?

L & 39; idea & 39; for the purchase of a PC & 39; can take part in a multitude of people, but they feel as undecided time to go to a traditional desktop or a lightweight portable laptops. Several aspects must be taken into account, as for the purposes of exploration. If & 39; main objective of the & 39; purchase of a computer & 39; for & 39; occasional use, regardless of the fact that it & 39; s & 39; act at work or entertainment, one can buy a desktop traditional recital of the fact that the price is normally lower than those of portable Version.
The maintenance and possible updating of & 39; a desktop , is also much easier to drive and cheaper. If & 39; purchasers looking to spend less money & 39; d, l certainly & 39; computer, the models offer more opportunities to find better if it is treated or new. We can all around the & 39; local computer stores or special offers to surf in May to consider many possibilities, most stores.
Perhaps online with a computer, c & 39; is the fact that, quite often, it can be updated and tailored to personal needs, When users unprecedented manufacturers. In most cases, it is authorized local computer saving technical changes or upgrades of satisfaction. The desktop computers are for work and leisure, although, whatever their configuration, or how they can be quickly, it seems that the & 39; reaching an instrument of everyday modern times.
On l & 39; other hand, if the main reason for the purchase of & 39; a & 39; Computers portability, but in that case, & 39; laptop was the right choice. There are several brands on the market, offers a wide range of configurations, from simple to the most demanding and powerful in the late model laptops. After a search on the model best suits your needs, you will still be able to choose to buy a new & 39;, outdated or uses, for reasons of economy & 39; d & 39; a certain amount d & 39; money. Keep in mind that the & 39; bought a refurbished laptop computer that a general rule, the full faith and credit, as if it had bought & 39; a whole new paradigm, but for a little more than n & 39; cost.
Just any other purchase, it is important & 39; carefully researched to find out what exactly are your needs and what you do with it. Lightweight and portable laptops are more beautiful, although usually more expensive. Similarly, the lighter models almost always have a small screen and a keyboard more compact than traditional models of laptops. So, in this case, if the weight & 39; n is not a critical issue, as you perhaps consider the & 39; purchase of a laptop & 39; traditional model regularly as long as it & 39; meets your needs. If you select this option, you will certainly be later, a big saving & 39; an amount of money.
If You are the kind of person his skepticism toward the purchase of & 39; a & 39; instandgesetzten computer, as it had already been submitted by the manufacturer, relax, there are a few times Absolutely nothing wrong with the unit & 39; returned. There may be only a matter of preference d & 39; a model or a small matter that didn t l & 39; former owner of preferences. Keep in mind that the & 39; d & 39; a laptop with a full guarantee of reprocessing is only as good as the mark of & 39; a new and perhaps even better for big discounts offers.
Also he, as a general rule, you can use a number of bargains in the refurbished notebooks. Note that the difference between the new and outdated laptops, c & 39; is that the former, as a general rule, is that the elderly a laptop computer was used, then revegetated, often by a third party, and Following say, in general, that he & 39; a problem Eu went back to the manufacturer, we fix, and now it is possible at a fair price, with the full remission manufacturer guarantee.
The a good solution for computers linked by "tasks, which he & 39; s & 39; act in office or a laptop depends above all on a To work or leisure. Search carefully for the best deals and you avoid paying accessories for extra & 39; you is barely used. In addition, a look at obsolete (the full faith and credit) of & 39; computer. The price will certainly be surprised. And it could be too! Freelance
Antonio Silva-burner PoloMercantil
This article is licensed under the GNU FDL, and can be distributed without prior permission of the author & 39;. But the name of the author & 39; and & 39; URL & 39, (left), in the biography section of & 39; and must kept.
This article may also be in the language, Portuguese, at page news articles PoloMercantil
Antonio Silva is free of & 39; author of articles & 39; for & 39; Internet. He is currently working as a writer for www.PoloMercantil.com.br ramiro iggy



Bookmark it:

Security and Internet Browsers Firefox vs. Internet Explorer

Introduction
The Internet is becoming a more and more dangerous place to be, due in no small part to the inherent security risks posed by viruses and spyware. Additionally, applications that access the Internet as part of their normal operations may have errors in their code that allows hackers to launch attacks against the computer on which those applications are running. The safety and integrity of digital assets is further compromised by the fast-growing threat of cybercrooks who devise and implement large-scale hoaxes such as phishing and ID theft.
In the light of all this, it s clear that users need a reliable and secure web browser between them and the Internet, which will be free of these problems and won t let harmful content invade the computer.
The web browser industry continues to be dominated by the Windows-bundled Internet Explorer, with an 85% market share, but in recent years a new breed of free, more functional and resilient browsers has appeared the most popular being Mozilla/Firefox and Opera. All have received serious security upgrades to help protect against recent scares and safeguard users online.
Internet Explorer is at version 6.0, essentially the same product that was included with Windows XP in 2001. Eighteen months ago, the release of Windows XP Service Pack 2 substantially increased IE safety; however, it did not eliminate many of the loopholes exploited by hostile program code. At present, Firefox is at version 1.5, but its very different development history (see next section) means that it can be considered at a similar level of maturity as Internet Explorer.
Currently, Microsoft is preparing its next-generation browser, Internet Explorer 7.0, which it plans to introduce sometime during the first half of 2006. The company has stated that it intends to make the browser stronger and more secure to help protect its users against the many problems that have dogged the software over the years.
We, along with Internet users everywhere, await the final results with interest. In the meantime, we decided to undertake our own security evaluation of both IE 7 (beta) and its closest rival, Firefox 1.5.
History and overview
Internet Explorer is a proprietary graphical web browser developed by Microsoft. In 1995, the company licensed the commercial version of Internet Explorer 3.0 from Spyglass Mosaic and integrated the program into its Windows 95 OSR1 edition. Later, it included IE4 as the default browser in Windows 98 a move which continues to raise many antitrust questions.
Firefox is an open-source browser developed by the Mozilla Foundation; anyone who is proficient enough can collaborate in writing and improving its program code. Mozilla is known for its stringent approach to security, promising a bounty of several thousand dollars for any major vulnerability found in the product.
Security incidents and threat response
While no browser is perfect, major security lapses happened rather more frequently with IE than with Firefox. To be fair, Firefox has less than a 10% market share and is thus a rather less enticing target than IE; that s probably also why security researchers focus much of their attention on the vulnerabilities of Microsoft s browser, not Firefox s. Some people have argued that if the market shares were reversed, bugs in Firefox would start appearing on a more frequent basis, as has recently been the case with Internet Explorer.
The open-source architecture of Firefox contributes to the overall safety of the browser; a community of skilled programmers can spot problems more quickly and correct them before a new release is available for general use. It s been said that threat response time for Firefox averages one week, while it may take months for Microsoft engineers to fix critical bugs reported by security analysts an unacceptable situation for users who remain unnecessarily vulnerable to exploits (hacker attacks) during that time.
>From the threat response standpoint, Firefox is clearly the winner.
Security features
Phishing safeguard
New protection against financial fraud and identity theft has been incorporated into the new IE. A so-called phishing filter now appears on the Internet Options menu, which is intended to protect users against unknowingly disclosing private information to unauthorized third parties. Here s how it works:
If a user visits a spoofed site which looks exactly like a genuine one usually as a result of clicking on a link in a fraudulent email - the browser senses a phishing attempt and compares the site against a list of known phishing sites. If the filter finds the site is a phishing culprit, it blocks access to the site and informs the user of the danger of leaving his/her personal details on sites like this. The database of known phishing sites is updated regularly, and users have an option to report a suspected phishing instant to Microsoft for evaluation.
We re pleased to report that, even in beta, the filter appears to work quite well, correctly identifying half of the test sites we visited as phishing sites.
In Firefox, phishing protection is delivered through third-party extensions such as Google Safe Browsing (currently in beta for US-based users only (see http://www.google.com/tools/firefox/safebrowsing/index.html); this can be plugged into the browser s extension menu.
As additional protection against accidental phishing, the authors of IE have stated that they plan to make their product display the URL of every visited site. With IE 6, this capability was not available and many pop-ups appeared without displaying an address in the previously non-existent address bar. Unfortunately, in neither browser were we were able to achieve more than a fifty percent URL display ratio; we trust that this percentage will increase as the release of IE 7 approaches and Mozilla continues to work on improving its functionality in this area.
Restriction of executable Web content
In the current version of IE, suspect websites have been free to install almost any software they want on visitors machines. While XP SP2 has dramatically reduced this possibility, many unnecessary add-ons and toolbars can still be easily installed by inexperienced users. IE 7 should provide more protection for na ve users, as it will offer to run in protected mode, thus restricting access to the host OS files and settings and making these critical elements of the computer inaccessible to malware.
The default setting for Firefox 1.5 is to have installation of extensions and add-ons disabled; the user must manually change settings in order to enable adding extensions to the browser.
There will always be a tradeoff between security and functionality, but security experts always maintained that letting websites unrestrictedly launch executable code within the browser creates unlimited potential for exploitation. IE 7 will offer much greater flexibility in configuring which external code will be permitted to run within the browser and what impact it would have on the OS.
ActiveX restrictions
Aside from some graphics enhancement of web pages, in most cases ActiveX is more damaging than beneficial. Many sites that serve up spyware and pop-up ads use ActiveX scripting technology, and ActiveX scripting in the Windows environment can be allowed to run unrestrictedly with administrator (root) privileges. Firefox 1.5 does not support Microsoft s proprietary ActiveX technology and so the Firefox browser is more resilient against spyware infection.
In IE6, even with SP2, ActiveX is allowed to run by default, which automatically renders IE users less protected against the threat of spyware. In the upcoming IE 7, it is not yet known whether Microsoft will continue this approach, but early indications point to this being the case. This would be unfortunate, since the current approach is a clear security vulnerability.
Of course, IE users can manually disable ActiveX scripting on a particular website and let ActiveX be started automatically on all other sites visited. Or, vice versa, they can disable ActiveX scripting on most of the sites visited and permit it to run on a particular site. All this can be configured under the Security tab in IE s Options menu. However, it is hardly realistic to expect Internet novices, who need the most protection, to do this.
Java, JavaScript and Visual Basic components
Java and JavaScript can be enabled and disabled by both browsers. Firefox allows users to specify permissions for particular actions performed by these scripts. IE 6 allows users to create a group of trusted sites to which global limitations on these scripts will not apply. In IE 7, more flexibility will be added that will lead users toward a more customized display of web pages belonging to a particular site; it appears Firefox also plans to introduce more flexible parameters.
Internal download manager
IE 7 s download manager will be revamped, and feature an option to pause and resume downloads - a feature not available with the current version. Specific actions will be able to be defined following the completion of a download, and users can check the newly-downloaded file with their anti-virus before running it. This approach is already in place with Firefox, so Microsoft appears to be playing catch-up here.
Encryption of data on protected sites
When you submit sensitive information, such as transaction details to a bank or financial institution, it travels in an encrypted form through a secure HTTP (SHTTP) connection. The information is encrypted by your browser and decrypted at the receiving end. The new version of IE will use stronger encryption algorithms to reliably transfer your data without the risk of being intercepted and deciphered by someone in transit. A padlock icon indicating that a user is on a secure site will be placed in a more obvious place than currently, and more detailed information will be provided to help visitors check the authenticity of such sites.
Firefox currently has a better-organized display of security certificates for its users, so clearly Microsoft has a room for improvement.
Updating
Both browsers are updated automatically when new code is ready. Firefox has this update mechanism already in place, and for IE 7, it is expected that updates will be provided through Windows update technology.
Privacy enhancements
IE 7 will have the ability for users to flexibly set what private data will be saved and can be applied to different sites; users will be able to easily remove browsing history and other private details such as passwords, cookies, details submitted on web forms, download history, and temporary files. In IE 6, these files were stored all over the place and users have complained that there is no clear way to delete this information. Firefox 1.5 already provides this capability.
Conclusion
IE 7 promises a lot of interesting security and privacy enhancements that will help users stay more secure. With the final release users will receive a good, solid browser that, if Microsoft promises are fulfilled, will help it to compete well on the security front. As we have seen, Firefox 1.5 is already a role model, and it will be interesting to see what lies ahead for this talented challenger.



Bookmark it: